Assessment of Burn Cases Visited in Hospital for Surgical Treatment

  • R D Sharma Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India.
Keywords: Burn, Surgery.


Background: Burns can be very destructive, and severely endanger the health and lives of humans. It maybe causes disability and even psychological trauma in individuals. Hence; the present study was undertaken for assessing burn cases visited in hospital for surgical treatment.

Materials and methods: A total of 269 burn patients were enrolled in the present study. Complete demographic profile and clinical details of all the patients was obtained. All the patients were segregated into various socio-economic classes on the basis of Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic status scale. Swabs were taken from the burn areas and were inoculated into culture media for assessing the growing microorganisms. All the results were recorded in Microsoft excel sheet.

Results: Mean hospital stay was found to be 39.6 days. Conservative treatment without surgical intervention was done in 187 patients while surgical treatment was done in 82 patients. Most common microorganism growing in the burn areas were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus sp. and Escherichia coli.

Conclusion: Burn patients should be initially conservatively managed by adequate resuscitation, early wound debridement and closure.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Sharma R. Revised Kuppuswamy's Socioeconomic Status Scale: Explained and Updated. Indian Pediatr. 2017 Aug 26. pii: S097475591600090.
2. American Burn Association/American College of Surgeons. Guidelines for the operation of burn centers. J Burn Care Res. 2007;28:134–141.
3. Colohan SM. Predicting prognosis in thermal burns with associated inhalational injury: a systematic review of prognostic factors in adult burn victims. J Burn Care Res. 2010;31:529–39.
4. Jackson DM. The diagnosis of the depth of burning. Br J Surg. 1953;40:588–96.
5. Hettiaratchy S, Dziewulski P. ABC of burns: pathophysiology and types of burns. BMJ. 2004;328:1427–9.
6. Mishra D, Singh HP. Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic status scale--a revision. Indian J Pediatr. 2003 Mar;70(3):273-4.
7. Kowalske KJ. Burn wound care. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Am. 2011;22:213–27.
8. Tan JQ, Zhang HH, Lei ZJ, Ren P, Deng C, Li XY, et al. The roles of autophagy and apoptosis in burn wound progression in rats. Burns. 2013;39:1551–6.
9. Leblebici B, Adam M, Bağiş S, Tarim AM, Noyan T, Akman MN, et al. Quality of life after burn injury: The impact of joint contracture. J Burn Care Res 2006;27:864-8.
10. Ozkaya NK, Aktar S, Algan S, Akkaya H. A retrospective analysis of tandoor burn injuries in Eastern Anatolia. Turk J Plast Surg 2019;27:23-9.
11. Albayrak Y, Temiz A, Albayrak A, Peksöz R, Albayrak F, Tanrıkulu Y. A retrospective analysis of 2713 hospitalized burn patients in a burns center in Turkey. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Jan;24(1):25-30.
12. Tekin R, Yolbas I, Dal T, Okur MH, Selçuk CT. The evaluation of patients with burns during fifteen years period. Clin Ter. 2013;164(5):385-9.
How to Cite
Sharma RD. Assessment of Burn Cases Visited in Hospital for Surgical Treatment. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res [Internet]. 2019Sep.30 [cited 2021Apr.16];5(3):9-11. Available from: