A Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence of Uropathogens and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern in Patients of Urinary Tract Infection in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

  • Trilok Patil Associate professor, Department of Microbiology, Pacific Institute of Medical Sciences, Udaipur.
  • Manish Jain Associate professor, Department of Pharmacology, Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur.
Keywords: Urinary Tract Infections, . Escherichia coli, Klebseilla pneumoniae, Antimicrobial agents.


Background: Antibiotic Resistance has now become a big threat as antibiotics are no more useful now a days, as they were previously. The objective of this study was to analyse the various bacterial isolates found in Urinary Tract Infection. Methods: This Retrospective study was conducted in the department of Microbiology in collaboration with the department of Pharmacology of Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur,
Around 705 culture proven urine isolates were retrospectively studied. The samples were collected during one year from both the inpatient as well as the outpatient department of Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur
. Results: Uropathogenic strains from inpatient and outpatient departments were studied for their susceptibility profiles. The various isolates were Escherichia coli, Klebseilla pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of these isolates revealed that for outpatients, first generation Cephalosporins, nitrofurantoin, Norfloxacin/ciprofloxacin were effective for treatment of urinary tract infection but for inpatients, parenteral therapy with newer aminoglycosides and third generation Cephalosporins should be administered as the organisms for nosocomial UTI exhibit a high degree of drug resistance. Conclusion: Culture and sensitivity of the isolates from urine samples should be done as a routine before starting the antimicrobial therapy.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Sharma S. Current understanding of Pathogenic mechanisms in UTIs. Ann Natl Acad Med Sci 1997; 33(1):31-8.
2. Gruneberg GN. Antibiotic sensitivities of urinary pathogens: 1971-1982. J Antimicrob Chemother 1984; 14:17-23.
3. Jones RN, Thornsberry C. Cefotaxime: a review of in vitro antimicrobial properties and spectrum of activity. Rev Inf Dis 1982; 4:5300-15.
4. Fu KP, Neu HC. Betalactamase stability of HR 756 a novel cephalosporin, compared to that of cefuroxime and cefotaxime. Antimicrob Agents chemother 1978; 14:322-326.
5. Nokashino SS, Nakamuro M. In vitro activity of cefotaxime against clinically significant pathogens. Drugs 1988; 35(2):14-21.
6. Collee JG, Duguid JP, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A. Laboratory strategy in diagnosis of infective syndromes. In Mackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology 14th edition (Churchill Livingstone produced by Longman Singapore Publisher Ltd.) 1996: 88.
7. Microorganisms encountered in the urinary tract. In Bailey & Scott's diagnostic microbiology (9th edition). Baron EJ, Finegold SM, Eds (Mosby publishers, St. Louis, Missouri) 1994:256.
8. Agarwal KC. Antibiotic sensitivity test by disc diffusion method: Standardization and interpretation. Indian J Pathol Bacteriol 1974; 17:149-59.
9. Varma NC, Taneja OP, Saxena SN. Recurrent urinary tract infections in females. J Ind Med Ass 1972;58:155-58.
10. Devmurari D, Kamal CM, Singh SN, Kumar A. Ofloxacin and Nitrofurantoin sensitivity pattern In Patients of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res. 2015 Aug;1(1):17-22
11. Bajaj JK, Karyokarte RP, Kulkarni JD, Deshmukh AB. Changing aetiology of urinary tract infections and emergence of drugs resistance as a major problem. J Commun Dis 1999; 31(3):181-84.
12. Ashkenazi S, Even TS, Samra Z, Dinari G. Uropathogens of various populations and their antibiotic susceptibility. Paediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10:742-46.
How to Cite
Patil T, Jain M. A Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence of Uropathogens and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern in Patients of Urinary Tract Infection in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res [Internet]. 2016Sep.28 [cited 2020Sep.24];2(3):58-0. Available from: https://www.iabcr.org/index.php/iabcr/article/view/168